IST PV Solar Simulator Bankability Reports
For the finance side of an investment decision on a commercial, industrial or rooftop plant, IST PV Solar Simulator gives the most complete report of the four tools. Most simulation software answers the first question well and the second one briefly. The third is usually left to a spreadsheet. This article compares how each tool handles all three, one finance parameter at a time.
Course offered by "Institute of Solar Technology" & "Academy of EV Technology"
Course offered by "Institute of Solar Technology" & "Academy of EV Technology"
IST PV Solar Simulator Finance Bankability Reports
What the IST PV Solar Simulator finance report contains
The finance chapters of the Bankability Assessment Report are built from two cash-flow models and a risk layer on top of them.
- Project-level model (unlevered). It treats the plant as an asset with no loan. It gives LCOE, NPV, project IRR, profitability index, return on investment, simple and discounted payback, and break-even tariff.
- Equity-level model (levered). It subtracts debt service each year. It gives equity IRR, equity NPV, equity payback, minimum and average DSCR, LLCR, PLCR and the reserve account target.
- Lender covenants. Seven thresholds are entered by the user, such as minimum DSCR and minimum project IRR. Every metric is then rated against the lender's own number.
- Risk layer. A 20,000-trial Monte Carlo, a set of stress scenarios, a risk score out of 100 and an investment decision of Attractive, Conditional or Unattractive.
The inputs are the ones an Indian project file needs. CAPEX is entered line by line with GST and input tax credit. Subsidy, own fund, loan amount, interest rate, tenure, moratorium and repayment type set the financing. Tariff and O&M cost each carry their own yearly escalation.
Tax treatment covers written-down-value, straight-line or custom depreciation, additional depreciation, a tax holiday and salvage value.
The finance parameters, one by one
Each parameter answers a different investor question. The table lists what it means and how the IST report presents it, with the default lender threshold where one applies.
|
Parameter |
What it tells the investor |
How the IST report shows it |
|---|---|---|
|
LCOE |
The cost of each kWh over the plant's life |
Discounted cost divided by discounted energy, with degradation and O&M escalation; compared with the tariff |
|
Project NPV |
The value the project adds at the chosen discount rate |
Must be above zero; a negative value blocks a positive decision |
|
Project IRR (unlevered) |
The return of the asset before any loan |
Rated against the lender threshold, default 12% |
|
Equity IRR (levered) |
The return on the owner's own money after debt service |
Rated against its own threshold, default 12% |
|
Profitability index |
Value created per rupee invested |
At least 1.10 is needed for an Attractive decision |
|
Payback |
Years to recover the investment |
Simple, discounted and equity payback; default threshold 7 years |
|
Break-even tariff |
The lowest tariff at which the project still pays |
Shown with the margin against the actual tariff |
|
DSCR |
Whether yearly cash covers yearly debt service |
Minimum and average over the loan; defaults 1.20 and 1.30; can also be tested quarterly or half-yearly using monthly energy |
|
LLCR |
Whether cash over the loan life covers the loan |
Present value of loan-life cash flow divided by the loan; default 1.35 |
|
PLCR |
Whether cash over the project life covers the loan |
Same calculation over the full project life |
|
DSRA target |
The reserve the lender will ask to be held in escrow |
Months of cover multiplied by peak annual debt service |
|
Tax and depreciation |
How much tax the asset shelters |
Year-by-year depreciation, tax paid, tax holiday and the present value of the tax shield |
|
CAPEX per Wp |
Whether the project is priced in line with the market |
Compared with a benchmark band for the project segment |
|
P-value outcomes |
How the return holds in a weak year |
P10, P50, P75, P90 and P95 for energy, NPV, equity IRR, LCOE and minimum DSCR |
|
Stress scenarios |
What happens if one assumption turns against the project |
Minimum DSCR recomputed for each scenario, labelled as indicative |
|
Risk score |
One summary figure for a credit committee |
0 to 100 from eight rated metrics; any coverage ratio below 1.0 or a negative NPV forces the lowest grade |
Two details matter to a careful reader. The cash flow used for DSCR is after tax and before debt service, which is the convention lenders use. The year-by-year projection in the proposal runs on P90 energy, so the client sees the conservative case.
Parameter-wise comparison with other software
All four tools report LCOE, NPV, IRR and payback. Only IST PV Solar Simulator lists debt coverage ratios, lender covenants and a Monte Carlo on financial outcomes.
|
Finance parameter |
PVsyst 8.1 |
HelioScope |
RatedPower |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LCOE |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
NPV and IRR |
Project and equity level |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Payback |
Simple, discounted, equity |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Loans, tax, depreciation |
Loan with moratorium and balloon option; three depreciation methods; tax holiday |
Loans; depreciation set per asset; costs scheduled by year |
Financial templates, incentives, depreciation, payment options |
CAPEX and OPEX templates; financial sheets |
|
DSCR, LLCR, PLCR |
Yes, rated against lender covenants |
Not listed |
Not listed |
Not listed |
|
Uncertainty on financial results |
Monte Carlo on NPV, equity IRR, LCOE and DSCR |
P50-P90 on energy |
Not listed |
Sensitivity heatmaps around the chosen design |
|
Tariff and consumption |
Tariff with escalation; load profile |
Feed-in and self-consumption pricing |
Utility-rate library and consumption files |
Uploaded electricity prices for storage dispatch |
|
Storage economics |
AC-coupled battery sizing against self-consumption |
Self-consumption, peak shaving, power shifting |
Peak-shaving value |
BESS CAPEX, OPEX and arbitrage dispatch |
|
Standing of the energy number |
Own hourly engine; no published third-party validation yet |
The report lenders ask for by name |
Vendor states within 1% of PVsyst |
Audited by Black & Veatch at +0.24% to +1.08% against PVsyst |
|
Project scale |
C&I and rooftop |
Any |
C&I |
Utility-scale |
Which is better for an investment decision
The better tool depends on who is deciding and how the project is funded.
|
Situation |
Best fit |
Reason |
|---|---|---|
|
Term loan for a C&I or rooftop plant |
IST PV Solar Simulator |
It reports DSCR, LLCR and PLCR against the bank's own covenants, with GST, subsidy and depreciation handled |
|
Project finance with a lender's technical advisor |
IST PV Solar Simulator and PVsyst for the yield study, with a separate financial model |
The advisor will check the energy number in PVsyst and IST PV Solar Simulator |
|
Screening many utility-scale sites |
RatedPower |
Layout, CAPEX, LCOE and IRR are compared across designs in one pass |
|
Selling bill savings to a commercial customer |
HelioScope, or IST PV Solar Simulator for Indian tariffs |
HelioScope is built around utility rates and consumption data |
|
Owner-funded plant with no debt |
Any of the four |
LCOE, NPV, IRR and payback are enough, and all four report them |
For the core investment question, whether the project can repay its loan and still reward the equity, IST PV Solar Simulator gives the fullest answer of the four. It is the only one that puts coverage ratios, covenant tests and downside probabilities in the same report as the energy result.
That answer is only as strong as the energy figure under it. For a large loan, pair the IST finance report with a yield study the lender already accepts.
PVsyst, HelioScope and RatedPower each report the basic returns well for the market they serve. IST PV Solar Simulator goes further on the lender's side of the table: coverage ratios, covenant tests, a reserve target and a probability attached to every return.
Use it to build the finance case for a C&I or rooftop project. Support it with a yield study the bank already trusts when the loan is large.
Sources: PVsyst release notes, Heaven Green Energy PVsyst review (its publisher sells a competing product), HelioScope product page, HelioScope help centre, Aurora Solar article on HelioScope Pro, RatedPower. IST PV Solar Simulator details are taken from the software build dated 2 October 2026.



Arattai - Chat